Emeka Ike’s published data not classified, sensitive information – INEC tells court

The Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, has told an Abuja Federal High Court that the published data of Nollywood actor and Nigeria Democratic Congress, House of Representatives aspirant, Emeka Ike, was neither classified, sensitive nor confidential information.

INEC made the submission in a counter affidavit deposed to by Anthonia Makwe, an Assistant Director/Data Protection Officer in its Legal Drafting and Clearance Department, in opposition to a suit numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/1272/2026, filed by Emeka Ike at the Abuja Federal High Court on June 15, 2026.

The actor and politician, in the suit he filed against INEC and Lere Olayinka, media aide to Nyesom Wike, Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, is seeking N10 billion for alleged violation of his fundamental right to privacy.

Ike, through his counsel, Leonard Adeh, asked the court to declare that Olayinka’s decision to publish his data on X without his approval amounts to gross breach and violation of his fundamental right to privacy and the protection of personal data.

In the counter affidavit deposed to by Makwe, INEC, which is the second respondent in the suit, informed the court that such information are displayed and published in accordance with the Electoral Act 2026. It added that it has the “statutorily and constitutional function/power to make available information of its voters to the general public without the consent of any registered voter”.

Parts of the counter affidavit read, “In response to paragraph 5 of the Applicant’s Originating Motion, the 2nd Respondent’s statutory responsibility includes the compilation, maintenance, display, publication, certification and management of the register of voters in accordance with the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), the Electoral Act 2026, and the National Data Protection Act 2023.

“The 2nd Respondent has the statutorily and constitutional function/power to make available information of its voters to the general public without the consent of any registered voter.

“The issue complained of is not classified, sensitive nor confidential and that such information are displayed and published in accordance with the Electoral Act 2026.

“What is alleged to be posted by the 1st Respondent on his X platform did not emanate from the 2nd Respondent. The 2nd Respondent, as a Data Controller, has never breached its statutory duty of care, custody and protection of personal voter information and data, it owes the Applicant and other Voters under its secured portal and restricted database.”

Olayinka, had, his own counter affidavit filed by his counsel, Akpama Ekwe, averred that the only information contained in the document he published was the applicant’s name and passport photograph, and that the information was already in the public domain.

He stated, “Contrary to paragraph 6 of the Applicants supporting Affidavit the information published by the 1st Respondent (Lere Olayinka) was already in the public domain and was not accessed through any unlawful means.

“Contrary to paragraph 8 of the Applicant’s Supporting Affidavit, the 1st Respondent does not owe the Applicant any duty of care and confidentiality and does not require the consent of the Applicant to publish the Applicant’s

name and passport photograph that was already in the public domain.

“Contrary to paragraph 10 of the Supporting Affidavit, the Applicant who brought himself to contest election into the Federal House of Representatives, cannot be traumatized by the circulation of his name and passport photograph

which he personally presented to the public when seeking to contest election, and as a Nollywood star.

“Information supplied in voters card is not private data because by the provision of Section 19(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026, ‘the Commission shall, not latter than 90 days to a general election, appoint a period of seven days during which a copy of the voters register for each Local Government, Area Council or Ward shall be displayed or published for public scrutiny at every registration area and on its official website or every registration area and on its official website or any website established by the Commission for that purpose.

“Contrary to paragraph 11 of the Applicant’s Supporting Affidavit, the only information contained in the document published by the 1st Respondent was the Applicant’s name, and passport photograph.”

The suit has been adjourned till October 12, 2026, for hearing.