POLITICS
2027: Avoid contact with political parties in election disputes – CJN warns judges
2027: Avoid contact with political parties in election disputes – CJN warns judges
“There is also a need for greater professional responsibility by lawyers in the
institution of proceedings arising from political and electoral disputes.
“Forum shopping, whether by the deliberate choice of commencing an action in a court or division perceived to be more favourable to a particular party or by the institution of multiple proceedings seeking substantially similar reliefs, can result in conflicting orders, undermine orderly judicial process and expose the judiciary to avoidable embarrassment.
“It can also create the unfortunate impression that parties are seeking not justice according to law but a particular outcome from a particular court.
“There is, moreover, a broader institutional concern. It does not augur well for our judicial system or the administration of justice if the courts become so overwhelmed by political disputes that other cases in their dockets are
consequently delayed or denied the timely attention they require.
“The judiciary must remain available to all litigants, and the urgency or public
Every second brings Nigerians closer to exercising their democratic right and shaping the future of our nation.
Exercise your democratic right responsibly, peacefully and lawfully.
prominence of political litigation should not come at the expense of other legitimate claims awaiting determination.
“Counsel must exercise the professional judgment expected of members of the Bar before commencing proceedings, particularly where related proceedings are already pending before another court.
Channel
“The duty of counsel to the court requires full candour as to the existence of related
proceedings and respect for the jurisdiction and processes of other courts.
“The responsibility of counsel extends beyond securing an immediate advantage for a client; it includes a duty to protect the integrity and orderly functioning of the judicial process.”
The CJN also canvassed adequate protection of processes leading to the appointment of judicial officers.
According to her, the appointment of judicial officers is one of the most consequential responsibilities entrusted to the National Judicial Council, NJC, and the Federal Judicial Service Commission, FJSC.
“A judge does not merely occupy an office; he or she carries the authority of the Constitution and the confidence of the people. For that reason, the processes through which judicial officers are selected must command public confidence.
“The recent appointments have reflected a deliberate effort to strengthen the evaluation of candidates through structured assessment, professional and peer feedback, background checks and, in the case of shortlisted candidates, an opportunity for members of the public to comment on their integrity and professional reputation.
“This process must be protected from abuse. It should never become a trial by publicity or an avenue for settling personal disagreements and professional scores.
“The same restraint is required in the wider public space, where social media
is increasingly used to turn professional disagreements into personal attacks,
ridicule, threats and harassment. We must resist this culture.
“There are proper channels for criticising judgments, reporting professional misconduct and complaining about the conduct of judicial officers or legal practitioners.
“The administration of justice cannot be left to anger, intimidation or trial by social media.
“A judge should be able to decide according to law without fear of personal retaliation. A lawyer should be able to make a legitimate submission without being subjected to intimidation.
“A member of staff should be able to perform his or her duties without harassment. The dignity of the profession is the collective responsibility of the Bench and the Bar,” she added.
The CJN expressed happiness with the performance of the Supreme Court in the outgoing legal year.
“My Lords, the performance of the court during the Legal Year under review is encouraging, yet it reminds us that there is still much work to be done.
“During the 2025/2026 Legal Year, the Supreme Court handled 2,456 matters, comprising 1,179 general civil motions, 573 criminal motions, 13 Sharia-related motions and 676 appeals.
“The appeals comprised 433 general
civil appeals, 212 criminal appeals, 19 political appeals, 12 Sharia appeals and 10 Originating Summons. From these matters, 411 judgments were delivered.
“During the preceding Legal Year, the court handled 2,280 matters and delivered 369 judgments and rulings.
“These figures provide a useful measure of institutional activity, but they cannot tell the full story. One area to which I have continued to attach particular importance is the effective management of the court’s docket.
“When I addressed this gathering last year, I spoke about the need for deliberate case-management strategies to confront delay and the accumulation of pending matters.
“I am pleased to say that we can now point
to concrete steps taken in furtherance of that objective.
“Between the 23rd day of March and 17th day of December 2026, the E-Diary Office scheduled 1,385 matters for regular sittings of the Court, comprising 1,021 motions and 364 appeals.
“Significantly, 733 of these were old matters deliberately brought forward for hearing. In addition, 178 moribund matters were disposed of in Chambers, while 125 matters that had already been concluded were identified and removed from the active pool,” the CJN said.
2027, CJN,
DO YOU WANT TO WHISTLEBLOW, REPORT FRAUD, THEFT OR INJUSTICE OR INTIMIDATION? SEND US YOUR STORY/REPORT TO NEWSDESK@MEDIATODAY.NG
